IntroductionAcne vulgaris is a prevalent chronic inflammatory skin disease, and Cutibacterium overproliferation is a core pathogenic factor, yet findings remain controversial, partly due to single anatomical area sampling bias.MethodsWe conducted a crosssectional study with anatomically paired sampling across multiple facial anatomical areas in 85 subjects (30 healthy subjects, 55 acne subjects), analyzing 763 samples from 6 facial anatomical areas for 16S rRNA V4 region sequencing and microbial community analysis.ResultsAt the whole-face level, acne subjects had a significantly higher relative abundance of Cutibacterium and Staphylococcus compared with healthy subjects. Critically, Cutibacterium enrichment was highly dependent on facial anatomical areas: only the forehead and glabella showed significant intergroup differences, with the forehead showing a 127% higher median relative abundance (adjusted q = 0.043) and the glabella showing a 53% higher median relative abundance (adjusted q = 0.043), while Staphylococcus enrichment was widespread (present in 5 of 6 areas, except the jaw), and Corynebacterium showed no intergroup differences in any facial area, although LEfSe classified it as a health-associated taxon. Tax4Fun-based functional prediction suggested upregulated antimicrobial resistance and adaptation pathways, and downregulated core metabolic pathways, in acne-associated microbiota.DiscussionThis study demonstrates the facial anatomical area specificity of Cutibacterium enrichment, identifies the forehead and glabella as the areas with pronounced relative abundance differences between acne and healthy groups.
The forehead and glabella show pronounced Cutibacterium relative abundance differences between acne and healthy groups: a regional facial 16S rRNA gene sequencing study
Lei Shi

