In standard quantum mechanics, the time parameter tt in the Schrödinger equation is treated as an absolute, global background parameter. However, in General Relativity, proper time τ\tau is relational and depends on the local spacetime geometry and relative velocity dτ=12GMrc2v2c2dt.d\tau = \sqrt{1 - \frac{2GM}{rc^2} - \frac{v^2}{c^2}} \, dt. Spontaneous collapse models (such as Continuous Spontaneous Localization (CSL) or Penrose’s gravity-induced collapse) propose that quantum superpositions have a finite physical lifetime before collapsing into classical eigenstates. Consider a particle or photon moving along a lightlike path where the elapsed proper time is zero ( Δτ=0\Delta \tau = 0 ): Parameterization: Should a dynamical spontaneous collapse mechanism be parameterized by the global laboratory coordinate time tt or the particle's local proper time τ\tau ? Time-Dilation Effect: If collapse lifetime depends on the local relativistic proper time flow ( Timeflow0\text{Time}_{\text{flow}} \to 0 ), does relativistic time dilation freeze or prolong the superposition state ( TsuperpositionT_{\text{superposition}} \to \infty )? The Photon Paradox: Does this imply that massless particles (or highly time-dilated systems) never undergo intrinsic spontaneous collapse until forced by interaction with a massive, non-zero proper-time reference frame? How do current relativistic extensions of spontaneous collapse models reconcile this fundamental mismatch between relativistic kinematics and quantum state reduction?