The loss of market share we are already seeing for on-market cell therapy products is a result of in-class competitors for the same target and indication from rival innovator companies, not copycat products with identical CAR sequences. In such a market, sequence-limited composition-of-matter protection of the CAR sequence may have limited value. We are now seeing this play out at the UPC, with

Thinking beyond the sequence: CAR-T cell therapy litigation at the UPC (2seventy bio v Johnson & Johnson, UPC_CFI_029/2026)
Dr Rose Hughes (noreply@blogger.com)


