This essay completes a central question in the Gaitan Topology: what does it mean to say that God sustains the Now? It argues that sustaining should be understood not as a successive act of maintenance but as constitutive ontological dependence. A derivative actuality has no esse from itself; its being-actual is received from the Non-Derivative without succession or motion. The essay therefore distinguishes divine grounding from creaturely temporal succession: the creature receives its actuality continuously and in series, while divine grounding is non-successive. The Now is consequently not a thing that God sustains, but the invariant form that this grounding takes from within a temporal continuant. The essay also defines the mature Lemniscate as a per-continuant topology of temporal actualization, with a dimensionless crossing, epistemic loops of memory and anticipation, and temporal order generated through asymmetric condensation rather than motion within the figure. The account preserves genuine creaturely secondary causality and does not attempt to derive a theory of providence or the determination of future free acts from ontological dependence. It concludes by interpreting sustaining as constitution rather than preservation against decay: the creature does not first exist independently and then require maintenance, but is, in one undivided respect, given-to-be. ( direct link )