RNA Technology and IP Attorneys

Background of the Case The appeal arose from the refusal of Indian Patent Application No. 468/DELNP/2008 titled “Method and Arrangement for Optimising the Operational Times and Cell Change Performance of Mobile Terminals.” During the proceedings, the Court noted that despite the existence of Section 3(m), there were no clear guidelines on how Patent Office examiners...

The Bombay High Court recently considered two applications alleging wilful breach and disobedience of an injunction granted on 24 November 2010 in a trademark and copyright dispute concerning the mark “NOVA” and its associated artistic work. Since both applications arose from substantially the same alleged violations, the Court considered them together and disposed of them...

The Division Bench of the Delhi High Court in the More Than Water Private Limited v. Nesco passing off dispute involving “WATERBOX”, “MORE THAN WATERBOX” and “MY WATER BOX”, stressed that parties seeking interim equitable relief must approach the Court with clean hands, full disclosure and credible evidence. The Court declined interim relief to the...

The internet has blurred traditional ideas of territoriality. Businesses now rely on cloud infrastructure, data is stored and processed across borders, artificial intelligence models are trained on servers in different countries, and digital intermediaries operate through globally distributed networks. Against this backdrop, defendants in intellectual property disputes increasingly argue that Ind…

In a recent decision, the High Court of Delhi considered whether a plaintiff that had instituted a passing-off action could amend its plaint to add a claim for trade mark infringement after securing registration of the mark during the pendency of the suit. The judgment affirms that procedural law should facilitate the effective adjudication of...

In a significant ruling concerning the arbitrability of trademark disputes arising from contractual arrangements, the Division Bench of the Delhi High Court allowed an appeal against an order of the District Judge (Commercial), South District, Delhi, and referred the dispute between the parties to arbitration under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996....

CS(COMM) 1028/2024, I.A. 45301/2024 & I.A.26192/2025 Date of decision 24th July 2026 This judgment is among the first significant Indian decisions to examine how traditional copyright principles apply to generative artificial intelligence and large language models. In refusing interim relief to ANI Media Pvt. Ltd., the Delhi High Court considered whether OpenAI’s use of publicly...

Background The dispute arose from a suit filed by Malabar Gold Private Ltd. against M. Manuel, proprietor of “Malabar Fashion Jewellery,” before the Additional District Judge-II, Kozhikode, alleging trademark infringement, copyright infringement, passing off, and related reliefs. The plaintiff claimed exclusive rights over the registered trademark “MALABAR GOLD” and its lo…

This dispute concerns two leading battery manufacturers-Exide Industries Limited (“Exide”) and Amara Raja Energy and Mobility Limited (“Amara Raja”) and centers on Amara Raja’s alleged imitation of Exide’s distinctive trade dress and resulting passing off. The key question before the Calcutta High Court was whether Amara Raja’s adoption of a similar red-and-white color scheme, packaging...

CS(Comm) 519/2019 Judgement dated 06 July 2026 Brief Background The dispute concerns trademark rights over the competing marks ‘boAt’ and ‘BOULT’ for smart wearables and audio products, including headphones, earphones and smartwatches. Imagine Marketing Pvt. Ltd. (Plaintiff), owner of the ‘boAt’ brand, filed a suit against Exotic Mile (Defendant), owner of the ‘BOULT’ brand, alleging...

In a significant judgment concerning trademark protection in the education sector, the Delhi High Court Division Bench (DB) upheld the order of the learned Single Judge refusing to grant an interim injunction in a dispute between two well-known civil services coaching institutes, Vajiram and Ravi Isa Study Centre LLP and Vajirao and Reddy Institute Pvt....

The Calcutta High Court rejected IndiaMART’s request for interim relief against OpenAI, holding that there is no legal right to compel a private AI platform to display or promote a business’s links. The Court found that IndiaMART’s grievance was primarily commercial in nature and did not establish trademark infringement, disparagement, copyright infringement, or any independent...

Publication Registered design protection has emerged as an increasingly important intellectual property right in India, particularly for industries where product appearance significantly influences consumer choice. A valid design registration grants the proprietor a statutory monopoly over the visual features of an article and enables enforcement against competitors who adopt the same or an obvio…

The Traditional Approach For decades, brand protection followed a familiar playbook: register trademarks, monitor the market, and take action against infringers. That approach is no longer sufficient. Today, brands are discovered, compared, recommended and ranked by digital platforms and AI systems. Increasingly, the commercial value of a trademark is being captured not only at the...

In a trademark dispute concerning the mark “MEDILICE” used for anti-lice shampoo brought by Wings Pharmaceuticals (the plaintiff) and the defendant’s use of the mark “MEDILICE LICE KILLER” for anti-lice ayurvedic (herbal) hair oil, the court ruled in favour of the plaintiff. The note outlines the Appeal filed by the defendant before the Division Bench...

ROBERT A. MERRY AND CO. LTD. V PICCADILLY AGRO INDUSTRIES LTD CS(COMM) 1164/2025 & CS(COMM) 9/2026 INTRODUCTION This case concerns a trademark dispute over the use of the mark WHISTLER for whiskey in India. Robert A. Merry & Co. Ltd., an Irish whiskey company, claimed prior international use and reputation in the marks WHISTLER and...

India’s online gaming sector is moving into a more regulated phase. The Promotion and Regulation of Online Gaming Act, 2025 and the Promotion and Regulation of Online Gaming Rules, 2026 seek to distinguish legitimate online gaming and e-sports from prohibited online money games, while strengthening user protection, registration, classification and enforcement. For gaming businesses, this...

Overview of the case: In Flipkart Internet Pvt. Ltd. v. Joint Controller of Patents and Designs & Voicemonk Inc. (CMA(PT) No. 9 of 2024, decided on 05 January 2026), the Madras High Court upheld the Controller’s decision rejecting Flipkart’s post-grant opposition to Indian Patent No. IN312437. The patent concerns a virtual agent system that helps...

At first glance, the Delhi High Court’s decision in Panasonic Holdings Corporation v. Siddharth Vij may seem like a straightforward trademark dispute about cancellation of a deceptive similar mark. Panasonic filed the petition and argued that the respondent’s PONTA marks in Class 9 were too close to its earlier PENTA marks, and the Court agreed...