Recently, I did Melde's Experiment in our lab. To say about the procedure, we had to find the frequency of a electrically vibrating tuning fork (connected to a mass through string over a pulley) as shown, in two modes transverse and longitudinal. Now, if the standing wave in any mode with a wavelength λ\lambda , wave velocity vv , tension in the string be TT and mass per unit length of the string be μ\mu with the distance between two consecutive nodes as LL , then: λ=2L\lambda=2L and v=Tμ    Frequency, f=1λTμ    f=12LTμv=\sqrt{\frac{T}{\mu}}\implies \text{Frequency, }f=\frac{1}{\lambda}\sqrt{\frac{T}{\mu}}\implies f=\frac{1}{2L}\sqrt{\frac{T}{\mu}} Now, the frequency of the tuning fork (N)(N) can be determined based on which mode it is being operated upon i.e. N=f \text{, in the transverse mode}\\N=2f \text{, in the longitudinal mode} \tag{1} First, we performed the experiment in transverse mode where the string and prong of tuning fork are parallel, NN came out to 66 Hz66\text{ }Hz . But, when we performed in the longitudinal mode , it came out to be 96 Hz96\text{ }Hz i.e. ff in this case was averagely around 48 Hz48\text{ }Hz , a drastic error as it turned out that the true predetermined frequency is actually around 65 Hz65\text{ }Hz . Actually, from the starting the longitudinal mode setup was done wrong , since the prong and string wasn't exactly perpendicular, instead it was inclined at an around 3030 degrees with the perpendicular direction. This raised a question that there must be scaling factor between the frequency of the standing wave and of the tuning fork at every angle between the string and the prong as in the eq(1)eq(1) for the angles θ=0\theta=0 and θ=π/2\theta=\pi/2 . I then tried to find this scaling factor and reached this far as below: Let the angle between the prong and the string be θ\theta and let the amplitude of oscillation of the tuning fork be AA . Now, for a tuning fork vibrating at an amplitude AA , amplitude of oscillation of standing wave on string in purely transverse mode (θ=0)(\theta=0) would be AA and that in purely longitudinal mode (θ=π/2)(\theta=\pi/2) can be approximated to be around AA for a fork vibrating with high frequency, say NN . Then, we can take the components of amplitude AA in this mixed state to be AcosθA \cos{\theta} and AsinθA \sin{\theta} in the transverse and longitudinal directions as shown below: So, there would be two standing waves generated due to each component, perpendicular in directions i.e. one in vertical direction (longitudinal mode) and one in horizontal (transverse mode). Now, we were able to observe completely standing waves i.e. standing nodes in certain cases, hence I am assuming that both standing waves would have the same wavelength in some cases, say λ\lambda , since λ=2L\lambda=2L . So, the wave equations of the two waves can be written as: z=(A \cos{\theta}) \sin{(\frac{2\pi x}{\lambda})} \cos{(2\pi Nt)}\tag{2} and y=(A \sin{\theta}) \sin{(\frac{2\pi x}{\lambda})} \cos{(\pi Nt)}\tag{3} where, is the string is assumed to be along the xx -axis. The eq(2)eq(2) and eq(3)eq(3) represents the transverse and longitudinal waves respectively. Also, the frequency is taken as NN and N/2N/2 as even after distributing components, the fork would vibrate with the same frequency . Hence, the resultant would be: R=\sqrt{z^2+y^2}=Asin{(\frac{2\pi x}{\lambda})}\sqrt{\cos^2{\theta}\cos^2{(2\pi Nt)}+\sin^2{\theta}\cos^2{(\pi Nt)}}\tag{4} I thought the equation would take a simple form as : R=Asin(2πxλ)cos2πftR=Asin{(\frac{2\pi x}{\lambda})}\cos{2\pi f' t} where, ff' is a function of NN . But the above equation doesn't even seem to simplify further. So, how can I simplify it and if it can't be simplified then, is there any wrong assumptions in my analysis which gave this uncomplete answer ? How can this scaling factor be found? It also seems like that if there exists such a factor, it would be time dependent as there is time tt in the last equation in the analysis. Any comment on this?