Published on June 12, 2026 1:42 PM GMT I used an LLM to help redraft some arguments for an EA specific audience and it likely contains ca.10% AI-generated text, but I’ve edited/rewritten it extensively and endorse it. Epistemic status: The empirical claims rest on institutional sources cited at the end. The central argument, that AI safety research as a field does not ask whether its deployment trajectory is compatible with the physical systems it draws on, is visible in what the field's researc

Safe for What World? Why the AI safety field may be asking the wrong question
Benoît L.
