This paper examines the contrasting policy responses of Sweden and Norway to the Ukrainian refugee crisis, revealing how two seemingly similar Nordic welfare states have adopted distinct approaches to refugee reception and integration. Although both countries share humanitarian traditions and welfare-oriented governance models, Sweden has pursued a more restrictive and bureaucratic policy, limiting access to long-term residence, welfare benefits, and integration programs. In contrast, Norway has

Welfare Regimes in Crisis
Aysenur Polater (ijssrrjournal@gmail.com)
