Why does managerial prioritization of safety more readily correspond to frontline willingness than to frontline action? Drawing on upper echelons theory, the attention-based view, and organizational psychology research on the attitude–behavior gap, this study examines whether managerial safety cognition is associated with frontline safety outcomes through three organizational mechanisms: institutionalization, technological affordance, and team safety climate. Using multi-source, time-lagged data
When technology awakens willingness but stalls action: the asymmetric psychological translation of managerial safety cognition
Chen Su
